A real review screen, run on a made-up referral packet.

Everything here is synthetic. The packet is invented. The screen comes from AdmitScore™ itself: items quoted from the packet with their page, facts the packet states twice and differently, and what it does not document. Staff verify at the source and make the admission decision.

What the top of the review shows

The synthetic packet is six pages for “Test Patient A”. The review lists what it found in the packet’s own words and the page each came from. A “Located in packet” label marks an item the review found. A “Conflict” label marks a fact the packet states twice, differently.

Top of the AdmitScore review for a synthetic packet. Five items, each quoted from the packet with its page: hemodialysis every Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday on page 2; contact precautions on page 2; a bariatric bed and lift on page 2; a Medicare Advantage authorization approved for seven days on page 4, marked Conflict; and a Cefazolin stop date of 2026-10-14 on page 3, marked Conflict.
The product’s own review screen, rendered from a synthetic packet. It is not a mockup. Buttons in this picture are inactive. The extracted details in this example were entered by hand, so it shows the format, not extraction accuracy.

Quoted, with its page

Items on this screen show the packet’s own words and the page they came from, so staff can compare the review with the source.

Open the source page

In the live screen a button opens the packet page when the PDF is still open in the same browser tab. Without it, the page number and the quote remain.

Conflicts side by side

When the packet states a fact twice, differently, both statements appear with their pages and a reminder to read the source pages before relying on either.

What the packet leaves out, and what it says twice

An item the review could not find is listed as not documented in the packet reviewed. That describes the paperwork only. For a bariatric admission, the packet here asks for a bed and a lift and gives two different weights. The review shows both weights with their pages. It does not compare a weight with a facility’s limit, so staff check that themselves.

Missing and conflicting items for the same packet. Primary diagnosis: not documented in the packet reviewed. Medication stop date conflict: Cefazolin stop date 2026-10-14 on page 3 and 2026-10-21 on page 6. Current weight conflict: 412 lb on page 2 and 436 lb on page 5. Authorization conflict: approved for the initial 7 skilled nursing days on page 4, still pending review on page 6.
The same synthetic packet: one item not documented, and three facts the packet states twice, differently.

About this example

Synthetic

The packet, the patient and the plan are invented, and public materials never contain patient information. The review screen and the report builder are the product’s own code, run locally. This run had no AI step, so the extracted details that normally come from AI extraction were written by hand to match the packet.

Staff decide

AdmitScore does not generate admission recommendations, admission scores, projected margins, or reimbursement estimates, and it does not guarantee payer approval or reimbursement. The facility decision section is left blank for the facility to complete. Staff can verify each item against the packet.

Scope

This example covers dialysis, bariatric equipment and weight, authorization, medication dates and missing documentation. It does not show smoking status or long-term-care versus short-term-rehab questions.

Compare our time estimate with your own packet volume

See how we estimate the DON time, then work out your own review hours in the review-load calculator.