SNF admissions software
How AdmitScore organizes payer, clinical, documentation, medication, and facility fit signals before bed hold.
AdmitScore⢠helps admissions teams flag Medicare Advantage payer signals, prior authorization questions, skilled-need documentation gaps, and verification steps before making an admission decision.
Medicare Advantage now covers more than half of Medicare. KFF counts 55% of eligible beneficiaries, 35.2 million of 64.2 million people with both Part A and Part B, enrolled in MA plans in 2026. For most admissions teams that makes prior authorization the default condition of referral review, not the exception. Source: KFF, Medicare Advantage in 2026.
The numbers below come from primary sources: HHS OIG, KFF, and MedPAC. Treat them as planning context for how you staff and sequence payer review. They do not predict how any plan will decide any referral.
In a June 2026 report, HHS OIG reviewed 19 Medicare Advantage organizations and found they denied 12% of SNF admission prior-authorization requests in June 2024. Denial rates ranged from 0.4% to 23% by insurer, and requests for enrollees already living in nursing homes were denied at 40%, versus 11% for other enrollees. The plan on the face sheet matters. Source: HHS OIG, OEI-09-24-00331.
The same OIG review found that when SNF denials were appealed, plans overturned 95% in favor of the enrollee. Only 18% of denials were appealed at all. Read both numbers together: appeals are neither futile nor automatic wins, and the overturn rate describes the small appealed share, not the odds on any single case. OIG's own framing is that the overturn rate raises concerns about the initial denials. Source: HHS OIG, OEI-09-24-00331.
MedPAC's March 2026 report puts average fee-for-service Medicare payment at $20,970 per SNF stay, including beneficiary cost sharing, across a mean 30.7 covered days. MA plans pay negotiated rates that vary by contract, but the scale is why days lost to authorization clarification cycles are worth sizing in your own numbers. Source: MedPAC, March 2026, Table 6-2.
Many of the items that later show up in denial notices are checkable before the bed hold: payer and member ID against the portal, network status for the specific MA product, authorization scope in writing, carve-outs, and skilled-need documentation. The eight-point checklist below walks the full list, and the no-PHI documentation checklist structures the packet review.
Medicare rules set the initial reconsideration filing window, and the denial notice gives the applicable deadline and appeal instructions. Teams typically verify the written denial reason and instructions against current CMS Part C reconsideration guidance and the plan's Evidence of Coverage, then assemble the documentation the notice cites as missing. KFF's program-wide data shows the same shape as OIG's SNF findings: of 52.8 million MA prior-auth determinations in 2024, 7.7% were denied, 11.5% of denials were appealed, and 80.7% of appeals were fully or partially overturned. Source: KFF, January 2026.
AdmitScore reads the referral packet and surfaces authorization-readiness signals for staff review: payer questions, authorization scope, skilled-need documentation gaps, and follow-up questions for the case manager or payer. Signals are planning context to verify against source documents, not payer determinations, and facility staff make the final decision on every referral. The synthetic sample report shows the format.
Statistics reflect the most recent public data as of July 2026: HHS OIG (June 2026), KFF (January and June 2026), and MedPAC (March 2026). MA prior-auth volumes are program-wide across care settings; the 12%, 18%, and 95% figures are specific to SNF admission requests.
The platform is intended to assist review. It does not guarantee payer approval, reimbursement, admission outcomes, or denial prevention.
Shows payer information that should be verified against the referral packet, eligibility checks, and payer portal.
Flags whether packet content appears to support prior authorization review, pending staff verification.
Helps identify therapy, nursing, wound, medication, or care documentation that may support SNF level of care.
Surfaces gaps such as missing therapy evaluations, orders, medication records, or discharge details.
Produces questions for the case manager, payer, internal clinical team, or finance reviewer.
Tracks recurring authorization and documentation issues by payer, referral source, and facility.
AdmitScore runs through this list automatically and surfaces what's missing. Staff still verify each item against source documents. None of these guarantee payer approval. They're the prerequisites that make approval possible.
Acceptance moves faster than the payer portal check. Network status, benefit period, or member ID turns out wrong on day 2, and the bed is already held. AdmitScore surfaces payer signals alongside the clinical review so staff can verify before the hold.
A high-cost medication or a behavioral health carve-out only surfaces when the pharmacy bill arrives. AdmitScore flags carve-out exposure in the medication + care-cost surface so finance sees it before acceptance, not after.
"We'll get more days later" doesn't always work. AdmitScore separates authorized initial days from the escalation pathway in the authorization-readiness surface so staff know exactly what's contracted and what isn't.
When the same readout shows clinical fit and revenue impact side-by-side, financial pressure can leak into clinical judgment. AdmitScore returns scores by role: Referral Fit (financial-free, all roles) stays on the clinical review; admin-only Financial Fit and Margin layer in PDPM and denial-risk for administrators.
These public pages use synthetic or general examples only. They frame questions staff should verify before acceptance.
How AdmitScore organizes payer, clinical, documentation, medication, and facility fit signals before bed hold.
Admissions-level PDPM indicators that should be interpreted as planning context, not reimbursement guarantees.
A focused comparison for teams weighing broad post-acute AI platforms against a narrower SNF referral review workflow.
Outputs are review aids and should not be represented as payer approval.
The product helps flag potential issues, but payer outcomes still depend on payer rules and documentation.
AI-extracted payer and clinical information should be verified against source documents.
Clinical, operational, payer, and legal judgment remains with the facility.
No. AdmitScore helps staff review authorization readiness and possible documentation gaps, but payer approval depends on payer rules, source documentation, and staff verification.
Staff should verify payer, member eligibility, network status, initial authorization scope, continued-stay review expectations, skilled-need support, carve-outs, and missing documentation.
AdmitScore surfaces payer, documentation, medication, and clarification questions from the referral packet so facility staff can verify source documents before bed hold.
In a June 2026 report (OEI-09-24-00331), HHS OIG found that 19 reviewed Medicare Advantage organizations denied 12% of SNF admission prior-authorization requests in June 2024. Rates ranged from 0.4% to 23% by insurer, so the plan on the face sheet matters. Staff verify each referral against that payer's own requirements.
HHS OIG found Medicare Advantage plans overturned 95% of appealed SNF denials in favor of the enrollee, but only 18% of denials were appealed at all. The overturn rate describes the small appealed share, not the odds on any single case. Appeals are neither futile nor automatic wins.
Teams typically verify the written denial reason, the appeal deadline printed on the denial notice, and the plan's reconsideration process, then assemble the documentation the notice cites as missing. Facility staff make the final decision on every case. No tool or checklist guarantees an overturn.